Study looks at why the wealthy may still cut down on luxuries during recession

January 18, 2012 by Sue

From the University of Chicago Press Journals press release via EurekAlert!:

During an economic downturn, even people who are not directly affected spend less on goods and services that signal social status, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

Even when their consumption budget is unaffected by a recession, consumers will change their expenditure patterns because some of these expenses depend on social standards that shift with economic conditions,” write authors Wagner A. Kamakura (Duke University) and Rex Yuxing Du (University of Houston).

The authors delved into a study of the “budget effect,” where consumers under pressure first reduce their expenditures on nonessentials, thus increasing the share of spending on essential goods and services. “We argue that for products/services that are visible and nonessential, consumers draw value not only from consumption per se, but also from their ‘positionality,’” the authors write. Examples of “positional” goods and services are dining out, dressing up, being pampered, buying new furnishings, or flying around.

The authors analyzed U.S. household expenditure data for more than two decades, using a model that allowed them to separate budget and positionality effects. “As one would expect, we find that the share of consumption budget devoted to nonessentials (apparel, jewelry and watches, recreation, traveling) drops, while shares devoted to essentials (food at home, housing, utilities) increase during a recession due to the budget effect,” the authors write.

Wealthy consumers don’t necessarily spend less out of empathy for those who are less well off. Instead, they perceive a reduction in others’ expenditures on positional goods and services and feel they don’t need to spend as much to maintain the same status relative to their peers, the authors explain.

During hard times, visible luxuries are hit twice, because people generally have less to spend and those who can consume feel less compelled to show off. “Keeping up with the Joneses is less onerous when they are not keeping up,” the authors conclude.


No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.