{"id":15882,"date":"2013-11-20T11:04:14","date_gmt":"2013-11-20T16:04:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=15882"},"modified":"2013-11-21T03:03:50","modified_gmt":"2013-11-21T08:03:50","slug":"study-reveals-higher-levels-of-control-and-support-at-work-increases-wellbeing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2013\/11\/study-reveals-higher-levels-of-control-and-support-at-work-increases-wellbeing\/","title":{"rendered":"Study reveals higher levels of control and support at work increases wellbeing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Queen Mary, University of London media release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/factory-worker-night.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-15197\" alt=\"factory worker night\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/factory-worker-night.jpg\" width=\"290\" height=\"193\" \/><\/a>Research from Queen Mary University of London reveals positive aspects of working life &#8212; <strong>such as high levels of control at work, good support from supervisors and colleagues, and feeling cared for<\/strong> &#8212; support higher levels of wellbeing among Britain&#8217;s workers.<\/p>\n<p>The Whitehall II study*, published today in the journal <em>PLOS ONE<\/em>, was conducted amongst 5,182 London based civil servants and is one of very few longitudinal studies examining the positive effects on people at work.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Higher levels of wellbeing were impacted by:<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>High levels of control at work<\/li>\n<li>High levels of emotional support and being able to confide in others<\/li>\n<li>Low levels of job strain<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>New analyses of the study show that <strong>working conditions and good personal relationships increase levels of wellbeing &#8212; even after taking into account other sources of life satisfaction and distress, plus individual characteristics such as personality traits<\/strong>. The findings therefore suggest increasing the positive aspects of work &#8212; rather than simply reducing the negative aspects &#8212; may lead to improved morale and greater wellbeing among the working population.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this year the government published its first thoughts on the Measuring National Wellbeing programme launched in 2010 by David Cameron, and <strong>there are continuing discussions on how this could sit alongside Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a national indicator of progress<\/strong>. If wellbeing is adopted as a national outcome measure, it&#8217;s important to understand the factors constituting the nation&#8217;s wellbeing and this study indicates the quality of jobs available in the UK and personal relationships are key factors.<\/p>\n<p>Stephen Stansfeld, Professor of Psychiatry, Queen Mary University of London (Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry), comments: &#8220;<strong>The so-called &#8216;happiness debate&#8217; has gained a lot of attention in recent years, with economists, politicians and psychologists all hypothesizing on how to create a happy society<\/strong>. If the Government proceeds with the idea of measuring wellbeing as an indicator of Britain&#8217;s progress, it is crucial they know what impacts a person&#8217;s wellbeing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This study shows the quality of our working conditions and personal relationships are key to the nation&#8217;s happiness. <strong>We believe any policies designed to improve the workplace should not just minimise negative aspects of work, but more crucially, increase the positive aspects<\/strong>, such as a creating a greater sense of control and support among employees.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The quality of the working environment has a very important effect on how a person feels and greater wellbeing may also be related to greater productivity and performance at work, increased commitment and staff retention as well as effects on physical health and lifespan.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>*The Whitehall II study was established between 1985 and 1988 with a target population of all male and female civil servants, aged between 35 and 55 years, in twenty London based civil service departments. <strong>10,308 civil servants were examined in phase 1 of the study &#8212; 6,895 men and 3,413 women with a response rate of 73%, the true response rate was higher because around 4% of the invited employees<\/strong> had moved before the study and were not eligible for inclusion.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We analyzed data from phase 1 (1985-88, self-report questionnaire and screening), and phase 2 (1989, postal questionnaire, response rate 79%). The mean interval between phases 1 and 2 was 2.6 years. Our analyses are based on participants for whom complete data on covariates were available. <strong>Although most study respondents were white-collar employees, a wide range of employment grades (and salaries) from office support staff to the most senior government servants were covered<\/strong>.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The full study can be found on the Plos ONE website.<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Queen Mary, University of London media release: Research from Queen Mary University of London reveals positive aspects of working life &#8212; such as high levels of control at&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2013\/11\/study-reveals-higher-levels-of-control-and-support-at-work-increases-wellbeing\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[349,10,351,338,8],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15882"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15882"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15882\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15894,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15882\/revisions\/15894"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}