{"id":18335,"date":"2015-10-01T14:51:44","date_gmt":"2015-10-01T18:51:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=18335"},"modified":"2015-10-02T14:54:35","modified_gmt":"2015-10-02T18:54:35","slug":"are-american-schools-making-inequality-worse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2015\/10\/are-american-schools-making-inequality-worse\/","title":{"rendered":"Are American schools making inequality worse?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the American Educational Research Association\u00a0media release:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"first\" class=\"lead\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/studying_hard.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-9550\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/12\/studying_hard.jpg\" alt=\"studying hard\" width=\"200\" height=\"300\" \/><\/a>Schooling plays a surprisingly large role in short-changing the nation&#8217;s most economically disadvantaged students of critical math skills<\/strong>, according to a study published today in <em>Educational Researcher<\/em>, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Educational Research Association.<\/p>\n<div id=\"text\">\n<p>Findings from the study indicate that <strong>unequal access to rigorous mathematics content is widening the gap in performance<\/strong> on a prominent international math literacy test between low- and high-income students, not only in the United States but in countries worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>Using data from the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), conducted by the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), researchers from Michigan State University and OECD confirmed not only that low-income students are more likely to be exposed to weaker math content in schools, but <strong>also that a substantial share of the gap in math performance between economically advantaged and disadvantaged students is related to those curricular inequalities<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The authors &#8212; William H. Schmidt, Nathan Burroughs, and Richard Houang, all of Michigan State University, and Pablo Zoido, of OECD &#8212; found that in almost every one of the 62 countries examined, including the United States, a significant amount was added to the social class-related performance gap because of what students studied in schools. The 2012 PISA was the first international study to include student-level indicators of exposure to math content. <strong>The authors relied on data from more than 300,000 students, who ranged in age from 15 years and 3 months to 16 years and 2 months.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Our findings support previous research by showing that <strong>affluent students are consistently provided with greater opportunity to learn more rigorous content, and that students who are exposed to higher-level math have a better ability to apply it to addressing real-world situations of contemporary adult life<\/strong>, such as calculating interest, discounts, and estimating the required amount of carpeting for a room,&#8221; said Schmidt, a University Distinguished Professor of Statistics and Education at Michigan State University. &#8220;But now we know just how important content inequality is in contributing to performance gaps between privileged and underprivileged students.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the United States, over one-third of the social class-related gap in student performance on the math literacy test was associated with unequal access to rigorous content. The other two-thirds was associated directly with students&#8217; family and community background.<\/p>\n<p>On average, across the 33 OECD countries studied, <strong>roughly a third of the relationship of socioeconomic status (SES) to math literacy was due to inequalities in math coverage<\/strong>, with sizeable variation across countries, ranging from nearly 58 percent in the Netherlands to less than 10 percent in Iceland and Sweden.<\/p>\n<p>Among the 33 OECD participating countries, the U.S. ranked 11th in the relative importance of schooling to SES inequality.<\/p>\n<p><strong>There are striking differences in how countries group their students and structure their instructional opportunities,<\/strong> meaning that in countries like the U.S. there are greater within-school inequalities in content coverage, while in other countries such as France, Germany, and Japan inequalities are larger between schools.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of whether unequal learning opportunities for lower-income students were found within or between schools, they exacerbated inequitable student outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<strong>In the United States, public school curricular and tracking policies are contributing to the growing performance gap between poor and rich students<\/strong>,&#8221; said Schmidt.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Because of differences in content exposure for low- and high-income students in this country, the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer,&#8221; said Schmidt. &#8220;The belief that schools are the great equalizer, helping students overcome the inequalities of poverty, is a myth.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Burroughs, a senior research associate at Michigan State University, noted that <strong>the findings have major implications for school officials, given that content exposure is far more subject to school policies than are broader socioeconomic conditions.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the American Educational Research Association\u00a0media release: Schooling plays a surprisingly large role in short-changing the nation&#8217;s most economically disadvantaged students of critical math skills, according to a study published&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2015\/10\/are-american-schools-making-inequality-worse\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[344,319,335,346],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18335"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18335"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18335\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18405,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18335\/revisions\/18405"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}