{"id":18805,"date":"2016-02-24T15:02:23","date_gmt":"2016-02-24T20:02:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=18805"},"modified":"2016-02-24T15:02:23","modified_gmt":"2016-02-24T20:02:23","slug":"contact-with-nature-may-mean-more-social-cohesion-less-crime","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2016\/02\/contact-with-nature-may-mean-more-social-cohesion-less-crime\/","title":{"rendered":"Contact with nature may mean more social cohesion, less crime"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the American Institute of Biological Sciences media release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-16124\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/amish-countryside.jpg\" alt=\"amish countryside\" width=\"299\" height=\"199\" \/>Numerous studies have demonstrated the <strong>benefits of contact with nature for human well-being<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>However, despite strong trends toward greater urbanization and declining green space, little is known about the social consequences of such contact. In the December issue of <em>BioScience<\/em>, an international, interdisciplinary team reports on how they used nationally representative data from the United Kingdom and stringent model testing to <strong>examine the relationships between objective measures and self-reported assessments of contact with nature, community cohesion, and local crime incidence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The results in the report, by Netta Weinstein of Cardiff University and others, were notable. After accounting for a range of possibly interfering factors, including socioeconomic deprivation, population density, unemployment rate, socioeconomic standing, and weekly wages, the authors determined that <strong>people&#8217;s experiences of local nature reported via a survey could explain 8% of a measure of the variation, called variance, in survey responses about perceptions of community cohesion<\/strong>. They describe this as &#8220;a striking finding given that individual predictors such as income, gender, age, and education together accounted for only 3%&#8221; of the variance.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship with crime was similarly striking. According to the study results, <strong>objective measures of the amount of green space or farmland accessible in people&#8217;s neighborhoods accounted for 4% additional variance in crime rates<\/strong>. The authors argue that this predictive power compares favorably with known contributors to crime, such as socioeconomic deprivation, which accounts for 5% variance in crime rates. &#8220;The positive impact of local nature on neighbors&#8217; mutual support may discourage crime, even in areas lower in socioeconomic factors,&#8221; they write. Further, given the political importance placed on past crime reductions as small as 2%-3%, the authors suggest that findings such as theirs could justify policies aimed at ameliorating crime by improving contact with nature.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, the authors note that, <strong>unlike some easily measured ecosystem services (e.g., the provision of water or food), &#8220;the apparent benefits of contact with nature on social cohesion&#8230; are more challenging to tease apart and measure.&#8221;<\/strong> However, they express the hope that their study &#8220;stimulates consideration of how best to ensure that nature, at many different levels, can continue to benefit individuals and society into the future.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the American Institute of Biological Sciences media release: Numerous studies have demonstrated the benefits of contact with nature for human well-being. However, despite strong trends toward greater urbanization and&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2016\/02\/contact-with-nature-may-mean-more-social-cohesion-less-crime\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[355,339,351,338],"tags":[123,42,49,31,404],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18805"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18805"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":18806,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18805\/revisions\/18806"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}