{"id":20294,"date":"2017-04-13T14:24:39","date_gmt":"2017-04-13T18:24:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=20294"},"modified":"2017-04-10T00:47:39","modified_gmt":"2017-04-10T04:47:39","slug":"why-did-we-see-the-dress-differently-the-answer-lies-in-the-shadows-new-research-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/04\/why-did-we-see-the-dress-differently-the-answer-lies-in-the-shadows-new-research-finds\/","title":{"rendered":"Why did we see &#8216;the dress&#8217; differently? The answer lies in the shadows, new research finds"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the NYU press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"first\" class=\"lead\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-15013\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/vision_eyesight.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/>When &#8220;<strong>the dress<\/strong>&#8221; went viral in 2015, millions were divided on its true colors: gold and white or black and blue? In a new study, New York University neuroscientist Pascal Wallisch concludes that these <strong>differences in perception are due to our assumptions about how the dress was illuminated<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<div id=\"text\">\n<p>Those who thought that the dress, worn by the mother of a bride at a wedding in Scotland, was photographed in a shadow likely saw the garment as gold and white; by contrast, those who thought it was illuminated by artificial light were more likely to see it as black and blue.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The original image was overexposed, rendering the illumination source uncertain,&#8221; explains Wallisch, who serves as a clinical assistant professor in NYU&#8217;s Department of Psychology. &#8220;As a result, <strong>we make assumptions about how the dress was illuminated, which affects the colors we see<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Shadows are blue, so we mentally subtract the blue light in order to view the image, which then appears in bright colors &#8212; gold and white,&#8221; Wallisch continues. &#8220;However, artificial light tends to be yellowish, so if we see it brightened in this fashion, we factor out this color, leaving us with a dress that we see as black and blue.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a basic cognitive function: <strong>to appreciate the color on an object, the illumination source has to be taken into account, which the brain does continuously<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The findings, based on an online study with more than 13,000 participants, appear in the <em>Journal of Vision<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The study&#8217;s participants, who had previously seen the dress, were asked whether or not they believed it was in a shadow.<\/p>\n<p><strong>These beliefs &#8212; about whether or not the dress was in a shadow &#8212; strongly affected the perceptual experience of the dress<\/strong>. Among those who saw it in a shadow, four out of five participants believed it to be white and gold; by contrast, only about half of participants who did not see it in a shadow saw the garment bearing these colors.<\/p>\n<p>Wallisch then considered what could explain these findings. He hypothesized that <strong>differing perceptions could be linked to one&#8217;s exposure to daylight<\/strong> &#8212; quite simply, people who rise and go to bed early, and spend many of their waking hours in sunlight (i.e., under a blue sky), are more likely to see the dress as white and gold than are night owls, whose world is illuminated not by the sun, but, rather, by long-wavelength artificial light.<\/p>\n<p>To test this, he asked participants if they go to bed early and feel best in the morning (i.e., &#8220;larks&#8221;) or if they like to sleep in and feel best at night (&#8220;owls&#8221;), then matched this self-identified circadian type with how they saw the dress. Consistent with the hypothesis, larks were significantly more likely to see the dress as white and gold &#8212; relative to owls &#8212; underscoring the relative effects of exposure to daylight.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This suggests that <strong>whatever kind of light one is typically exposed to influences how one perceives color<\/strong>,&#8221; Wallisch says.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, demographic factors such as gender and age had comparatively small effects on the perception of the dress image.<\/p>\n<p>The findings broaden our understanding of how a bistable stimulus &#8212; i.e., one that is fundamentally ambiguous and open to subjective interpretation &#8212; works in color perception and, more specifically, offer new insights into a long-standing question about color perception: Is the color you see the same color I see?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The answer &#8212; based on this research &#8212; is &#8216;not necessarily&#8217;,&#8221; Wallisch observes. &#8220;If illumination conditions are unclear, your assumptions about the illumination source will matter, and those might depend on lifestyle choices, such as when you go to sleep.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the NYU press release: When &#8220;the dress&#8221; went viral in 2015, millions were divided on its true colors: gold and white or black and blue? In a new study,&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/04\/why-did-we-see-the-dress-differently-the-answer-lies-in-the-shadows-new-research-finds\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[339,60],"tags":[464,12,41],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20294"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20294"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20294\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20370,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20294\/revisions\/20370"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}