{"id":21008,"date":"2017-05-14T16:34:10","date_gmt":"2017-05-14T20:34:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=21008"},"modified":"2017-05-14T16:34:10","modified_gmt":"2017-05-14T20:34:10","slug":"study-looks-at-how-we-perceive-fictional-characters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/05\/study-looks-at-how-we-perceive-fictional-characters\/","title":{"rendered":"Study looks at how we perceive fictional characters"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the University at Buffalo press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"first\" class=\"lead\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-21078\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Watching-TV-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><em>The Sopranos<\/em>&#8216; Tony Soprano and Walter White from <em>Breaking Bad<\/em> rank among recent television drama&#8217;s most notorious protagonists, each of questionable morality. So, here&#8217;s the question: Do you like them?<\/p>\n<div id=\"text\">\n<p>If you answered &#8220;yes&#8221; as many people do, a recently published paper by a University at Buffalo researcher suggests <strong>why people might feel good about characters who do bad things<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The research has implications ranging from <strong>better understanding our relationship to fictional narratives<\/strong>, to <strong>possibly improving the effectiveness of character-based public service campaigns<\/strong>, according to lead author Matthew Grizzard, an assistant professor in UB&#8217;s Department of Communication and an expert on the <strong>cognitive, emotional and psychobiological effects of media entertainment<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The results, with co-authors Jialing Huang, Kaitlin Fitzgerald, Changhyun Ahn and Haoran Chu, all UB graduate students, appear in the journal <em>Communication Research<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Grizzard says the reasons an audience may like or dislike a character has been a key question for media researchers since the 1970s.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Morality matters<\/strong>. Viewers tend to like the good guys and dislike the bad guys. But Grizzard&#8217;s study, which builds on previous research, also suggests that <strong>we don&#8217;t necessarily need to see behavior to make a distinction between the hero and the villain<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Grizzard&#8217;s study manipulated what characters looked like and measured audience perceptions. They hoped to find out whether simple differences in appearance &#8212; for example black clothes compared to lighter colors &#8212; would be enough for viewers to categorize a character as a hero or villain.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier research, meantime, had found that <strong>heroes and villains differ in morality but not competence<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Villains aren&#8217;t just immoral. They&#8217;re good at being bad,&#8221; according to Grizzard.<\/p>\n<p>The previous research gave Grizzard&#8217;s research team a pattern for determining whether they were activating perceptions of heroes and villains or whether they were simply creating biases unrelated to narrative characters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If our data had come out where the heroic-looking character was both more moral and more competent than the villain, then we probably just created a bias. But because the hero was more moral than the villain but equally competent, we&#8217;re more confident that visuals can activate perceptions of heroic and villainous characters,&#8221; says Grizzard.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond an understanding of how <strong>visuals can influence perceptions of character<\/strong>, the findings indicate that <strong>judgments of characters depend on comparisons audiences make between characters &#8212; and the order of introduction plays a role<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Heroes were judged to be more heroic when they appeared after a villain and villains were judged to be more villainous when they appeared after a hero.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s happening here is that we&#8217;re not making isolated judgements about these characters using some objective standard of morality,&#8221; says Grizzard. &#8220;<strong>We&#8217;re constantly making comparisons about these characters and the forces they face<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>With Walter White, for example, the audience sees the evolution of a character whose ethics progressively spiral downward from season to season, and yet audiences remained loyal to him. That loyalty surprised <em>Breaking Bad<\/em> creator Vince Gilligan.<\/p>\n<p>Gilligan said in an interview that at some point he thought the audience would turn against the character. But Grizzard points out that the show&#8217;s antagonists concurrently get worse along with White.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We see a trend where White is not decreasing by himself. There&#8217;s likely to be a constant comparison with other characters,&#8221; says Grizzard. &#8220;So White is probably benefiting from the comparisons the audience is making.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Grizzard says it&#8217;s a <strong>polarization effect<\/strong>. The hero seems better when compared to the villain&#8217;s darkness while the villain seems worse when viewed in the hero&#8217;s light.<\/p>\n<p>But being bad isn&#8217;t, well, all bad, at least in the world of fictional narrative. It comes with certain advantages, according to Grizzard.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We find that <strong>characters who are perceived as villains get a bigger boost from the good actions or apparent altruism than heroes<\/strong>, like the Severus Snape character from the Harry Potter books and films.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These findings could be informative for public service campaigns or tele-novellas that try to promote certain behaviors.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It shows the importance of how these characters are framed,&#8221; he says.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the University at Buffalo press release: The Sopranos&#8216; Tony Soprano and Walter White from Breaking Bad rank among recent television drama&#8217;s most notorious protagonists, each of questionable morality. So,&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/05\/study-looks-at-how-we-perceive-fictional-characters\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[60,340],"tags":[363,32,12],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21008"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21008"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21008\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21079,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21008\/revisions\/21079"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}