{"id":25338,"date":"2017-12-27T09:37:17","date_gmt":"2017-12-27T14:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=25338"},"modified":"2017-12-26T03:39:08","modified_gmt":"2017-12-26T08:39:08","slug":"study-suggests-childrens-screen-time-guidelines-may-be-too-restrictive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/12\/study-suggests-childrens-screen-time-guidelines-may-be-too-restrictive\/","title":{"rendered":"Study suggests children&#8217;s screen-time guidelines may be too restrictive"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the University of Oxford press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-20974\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/05\/Child-with-computer-tablet-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><strong>Digital screen use is a staple of contemporary life for adults and children<\/strong>, whether they are browsing on laptops and smartphones, or watching TV. Paediatricians and scientists have long expressed concerns about the <strong>impact of overusing technology on people&#8217;s wellbeing<\/strong>. However, new Oxford University research suggests that <strong>existing guidance managing children&#8217;s digital media time may not be as beneficial as first thought<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this year the team published a paper disputing digital device guidelines for teenagers and proposing that a moderate amount of screen-time, known as the &#8216;Goldilocks&#8217; period, might actually boosts teenage wellbeing.<\/p>\n<p>In a new study, published in the journal\u00a0<em>Child Development<\/em>, researchers from the Oxford Internet Institute and Cardiff University conducted a similar study, assessing the impact of screen-time on children aged two to five. The team tested screen use guidelines recommended by the American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP), which proposes a limit of one to two hours per day, as good for the psychological-wellbeing of young children.<\/p>\n<p>Using data from approximately 20,000 telephone interviews with parents, the authors assessed the relationship between their children&#8217;s technology use and wellbeing. Over the course of a month this relationship was measured in terms of caregiver attachment, impact on emotional resilience, curiosity and positive effect. The results revealed a number of interesting findings that suggest that limiting children&#8217;s digital device use is not necessarily beneficial for wellbeing.<\/p>\n<p>The team found <strong>no consistent correlations between either the 2010 or revised 2016 advised digital usage limits and young children&#8217;s wellbeing<\/strong>. While children aged two to five whose technology usage was limited in-line with AAP guidance showed slightly higher levels of resilience, this was balanced by lower levels of positive affect.<\/p>\n<p>Further research indicates similar results to those reported in the recent study of adolescents; that moderate screen-use above the recommended limits might actually be linked to slightly higher levels of children&#8217;s wellbeing.<\/p>\n<p>Lead author Dr Andrew Pryzbylski, of the Oxford Internet Institute, said: &#8216;Taken together, our findings suggest that there is little or no support for the theory that digital screen use, on its own, is bad for young children&#8217;s psychological wellbeing.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;If anything, our findings suggest the broader family context, how parents set rules about digital screen time, and if they&#8217;re actively engaged in exploring the digital world together, are more important than the raw screen time. Future research should focus on how using digital devices with parents or care-givers and turning it into a social time can effect children&#8217;s psychological wellbeing, curiosity, and the bonds with the caregiver involved.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>The paper&#8217;s other findings of note include observations that our digital screen use increases with age, is higher in boys, non-whites, children with less educated caregivers and children from less affluent households.<\/p>\n<p>The authors found the AAP guidelines themselves to be based on out-of-date research, conducted before digital devices had become so ingrained into everyday life. As a result of this time lapse, they are becoming increasingly difficult to justify and implement.<\/p>\n<p>Co-author Dr Netta Weinstein, a senior lecturer in psychology at Cardiff University, said: &#8216;Given that we cannot put the digital genie back in the bottle, it is incumbent on researchers to conduct rigorous, up-to-date research that identifies mechanisms by and the extent to which screen-time exposure might affect children.<\/p>\n<p>Pryzbylski adds in conclusion: &#8216;To be robust, current recommendations may need to be re-evaluated and given additional consideration before we can confidently recommend that these digital screen-time limits are good for young children&#8217;s mental health and wellbeing&#8217;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the University of Oxford press release: Digital screen use is a staple of contemporary life for adults and children, whether they are browsing on laptops and smartphones, or watching&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2017\/12\/study-suggests-childrens-screen-time-guidelines-may-be-too-restrictive\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[9,348],"tags":[45,73,511,12,235,39,109],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25338"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25338"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25338\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25456,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25338\/revisions\/25456"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}