{"id":28546,"date":"2019-04-23T16:12:53","date_gmt":"2019-04-23T20:12:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=28546"},"modified":"2019-04-02T03:15:14","modified_gmt":"2019-04-02T07:15:14","slug":"study-suggests-short-term-memory-focuses-on-things-we-label-as-ours","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2019\/04\/study-suggests-short-term-memory-focuses-on-things-we-label-as-ours\/","title":{"rendered":"Study suggests short-term memory focuses on things we label as &#8216;ours&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Duke University press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"first\" class=\"lead\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-410\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/DinnerParty.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/>You&#8217;re in the middle of a conversation and suddenly turn away because you heard your name. Don&#8217;t worry, you aren&#8217;t rude.<\/p>\n<div id=\"text\">\n<p><strong>Our minds automatically pull attention to our names in a crowded room and to our faces in photographs<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>While this &#8220;<strong>cocktail party effect<\/strong>&#8221; of turning our attention toward self-related stimulation is well-known, scientists don&#8217;t know if something similar happens inside our heads. If a particular idea is associated with our selves, so we think about it faster than other thoughts? By testing for this &#8220;<strong>self-referential bias<\/strong>&#8221; in <strong>working memory<\/strong>, Duke researchers are starting to understand <strong>how our brains make us naturally self-centered<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Their work appears in the March 1 edition of\u00a0<em>Psychological Science<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<strong>People prioritize themselves in their minds<\/strong>,&#8221; said senior author Tobias Egner, an associate professor in the Department of Psychology &amp; Neuroscience. &#8220;The question is, how automatic is that prioritization? Is this something that you can&#8217;t help? If so, that could really bias how you make decisions.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Working memory<\/strong>, sometimes called short-term memory, is &#8220;our interface with the world,&#8221; said Egner, who is also a member of the Duke Institute for Brain Sciences. In order to read this sentence, for example, your working memory holds each word in temporary storage for a few seconds until you reach the period. &#8220;We use working memory to make complex decisions where we have to weigh different pieces of information and keep them in mind,&#8221; Egner said. &#8220;If you always put self-related information first, then this bias could drive your decisions by weighting that information more strongly and outcompeting other things in your short-term memory when you evaluate different options.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>To test for self-referential bias in working memory, the research team, a collaboration between Duke University, the University of Bath in the U.K. and Southwest University in China and funded by Chinese government grants, created a computer program and tested it on 102 study participants.<\/p>\n<p>First, participants learned to associate the colors blue, green and purple to labels of &#8220;friend,&#8221; &#8220;stranger&#8221; or &#8220;self&#8221; with a simple game. Then, two different-colored dots, like green and purple, would briefly flash on the screen. After a five-second pause, during which participants had to remember the locations and colors of the previous dots, a black dot would appear on screen. Participants then indicated if the black dot flashed in the same place as one of the colored dots, and if so, which label fit.<\/p>\n<p>Participants correctly identified the &#8220;self&#8221;-labeled dots significantly faster than the &#8220;friend&#8221; or &#8220;stranger&#8221; dots. That meant their working memory focused on the dots labeled with the &#8220;self&#8221; color.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Imagine you keep two things in mind,&#8221; Egner said. &#8220;If you&#8217;re being tested for either one of those, and you reliably answer one faster than the other, then you&#8217;re prioritizing it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Even though it&#8217;s an arbitrary association of colors and locations that has nothing to do with you, and there&#8217;s no point in you prioritizing one over the other for doing well at the task, we reliably show across four experiments that you&#8217;re always faster to respond to the &#8216;self&#8217;-reference cue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In a variation of the experiment, the researchers made the &#8220;self&#8221;-labeled color appear half as often as the &#8220;stranger&#8221; or &#8220;friend&#8221; colors, to see if participants would still prioritize &#8220;self&#8221; even if it made them worse at the task.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In spite of the fact that it would be much smarter for them to prioritize the other two, they are still faster with the &#8216;self&#8217; color,&#8221; Egner said. &#8220;That really suggests that <strong>there&#8217;s automaticity there<\/strong>: we can&#8217;t help but prioritize the stimulus that&#8217;s associated with ourselves.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Future research could include seeing if the effects hold with more difficult tasks, as almost all of the participants did each task correctly over the 80- to 100-minute trials.<\/p>\n<p>They could test if people who prioritized &#8220;self&#8221; more than others make more selfish decisions, by pairing this experimental set-up with altruism experiments. Researchers could also find a &#8220;price&#8221; for this automatic selfishness, by paying participants different amounts for identifying &#8220;stranger&#8221; or &#8220;other&#8221; labels.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You could differentially pay people for responding quickly to the different colors,&#8221; Egner said. &#8220;Then you could literally figure out how much more to pay for the &#8216;stranger&#8217; color than the &#8216;self&#8217; color to get the same performance speed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Duke University press release: You&#8217;re in the middle of a conversation and suddenly turn away because you heard your name. Don&#8217;t worry, you aren&#8217;t rude. Our minds automatically&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2019\/04\/study-suggests-short-term-memory-focuses-on-things-we-label-as-ours\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[526,4],"tags":[179,20,443,12],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28546"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28546"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":28658,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28546\/revisions\/28658"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}