{"id":31134,"date":"2020-03-12T09:08:27","date_gmt":"2020-03-12T13:08:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=31134"},"modified":"2020-02-24T01:24:31","modified_gmt":"2020-02-24T06:24:31","slug":"study-examines-peoples-reactions-of-stories-of-revenge-vs-forgiveness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2020\/03\/study-examines-peoples-reactions-of-stories-of-revenge-vs-forgiveness\/","title":{"rendered":"Study examines people&#8217;s reactions of stories of revenge vs. forgiveness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Ohio State University press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p id=\"first\" class=\"lead\"><strong>When it comes to entertainment, people enjoy seeing bad guys get their punishment more than seeing them be forgiven<\/strong>, a new study reveals.<\/p>\n<div id=\"text\">\n<p>But even though they don&#8217;t enjoy the <strong>forgiveness stories<\/strong> as much, <strong>people do find these narratives more meaningful and thought-provoking<\/strong> than ones in which the bad guys receive their just deserts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We like stories in which the wrongdoers are punished and when they get more punishment than they deserve, we find it fun,&#8221; said Matthew Grizzard, lead author of the study and assistant professor of communication at The Ohio State University.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Still, people appreciate stories of forgiveness the most, even if they don&#8217;t find them to be quite as fun.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The study was published online recently in the journal\u00a0<strong><em>Communication Research<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0and will appear in a future print edition.<\/p>\n<p>The study involved 184 college students who read short narratives that they were told were plots to possible television episodes.<\/p>\n<p>The students read 15 narratives: one-third in which the villain was treated positively by the victim; one-third in which the villain received a just punishment; and one-third in which the villain was punished over and beyond what would have been a suitable penalty for the crime.<\/p>\n<p>For example, one story involved a person stealing $50 from a co-worker. Participants read one of three possible endings.<\/p>\n<p>In one scenario, the victim bought coffee for the thief (under-retribution\/forgiveness); in another, the victim stole a $50 bottle of whiskey from the thief (equitable retribution); and in the third version the victim both stole his money back and downloaded porn onto the thief&#8217;s work computer (over-retribution).<\/p>\n<p>Immediately after reading each scenario, the participants were asked if they liked or disliked the narrative. <strong>More people liked the equitable retribution stories than those that involved under- or over-retribution, Grizzard said<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers also timed how long it took the readers to click the like or dislike button on the computer after reading each of the narratives.<\/p>\n<p>They found that <strong>readers took less time to respond to stories with equitable retribution<\/strong> than it did for them to respond to stories with under- or over-retribution.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;People have a gut-level response as to how they think people should be punished for wrongdoing and when a narrative delivers what they expect, they often respond more quickly,&#8221; Grizzard said.<\/p>\n<p>When the punishment did not fit the crime, the participants took a bit longer to respond to the story with a like or dislike. But why they took longer appeared to be different for stories with under-retribution versus stories with over-retribution, Grizzard said. The reason why may be explained by the next part of the study.<\/p>\n<p>After the participants read all 15 narratives, they rated each story for enjoyment (&#8220;This story would be a good time, fun, entertaining&#8221;) and appreciation (&#8220;This story would be meaningful, moving, thought-provoking&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>Participants thought stories in which the bad guys were over-punished would be the most enjoyable and those in which the bad guys were forgiven would be the least enjoyable to watch. Equitable punishment was in the middle.<\/p>\n<p>But they also said they would appreciate the stories about forgiveness more than the other two types of narratives.<\/p>\n<p>So the participants may have paused slightly before responding to the forgiveness stories to reflect, because they saw them as more meaningful, Grizzard said.<\/p>\n<p>But while they also paused for the over-punishment narratives, they did not find them more meaningful, only more enjoyable, he said. That suggests the pause may have been simply to savor the extra punishment the villain received.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It appears to be the darker side of just enjoying the vengeance,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the results suggest that a fair and just retribution is the &#8220;intuitive moral standard&#8221; that comes to us easily and naturally, according to Grizzard.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But <strong>seeing a lack of punishment requires a level of deliberation that doesn&#8217;t come to us naturally<\/strong>. We can appreciate it, even if it doesn&#8217;t seem particularly enjoyable.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"impact-unit-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"pgs-dpg-btn\" data-pgs-partner-id=\"sciencedaily\" data-loaded=\"true\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Ohio State University press release: When it comes to entertainment, people enjoy seeing bad guys get their punishment more than seeing them be forgiven, a new study reveals. But even though they don&#8217;t enjoy the forgiveness stories as much, people do find these narratives more meaningful and thought-provoking than ones in which the&hellip;&nbsp;<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":20250,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[363,12],"class_list":["post-31134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-perception","tag-perception","tag-psychology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31134"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31134\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31152,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31134\/revisions\/31152"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20250"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}