{"id":32866,"date":"2020-12-01T09:16:09","date_gmt":"2020-12-01T14:16:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=32866"},"modified":"2020-11-28T04:31:12","modified_gmt":"2020-11-28T09:31:12","slug":"study-suggests-diverse-thinkers-equal-better-results-when-decisionmaking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2020\/12\/study-suggests-diverse-thinkers-equal-better-results-when-decisionmaking\/","title":{"rendered":"Study suggests diverse thinkers equal better results when decisionmaking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Florida State University press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Whether it is ants forming a trail or individuals crossing the street, <strong>the exchange of information is key in making everyday decisions<\/strong>. But new Florida State University research shows that <strong>the group decision-making process may work best when members process information a bit differently<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Bhargav Karamched, assistant professor of mathematics, and a team of researchers published a new study today that tackles how groups make decisions and the dynamics that make for fast and accurate decision making. He found that <strong>networks that consisted of both impulsive and deliberate individuals made, on average, quicker and better decisions than a group with homogenous thinkers<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In groups with impulsive and deliberate individuals, the first decision is made quickly by an impulsive individual who needs little evidence to make a choice,&#8221; Karamched said. &#8220;But, even when wrong, this fast decision can reveal the correct options to everyone else. This is not the case in homogenous groups.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The paper is published in\u00a0<em><strong>Physical Review Letters<\/strong>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Researchers noted in the paper that the exchange of information is crucial in a variety of biological and social functions. But Karamched said although information sharing in networks has been studied quite a bit, very little work has been done on <strong>how individuals in a network should integrate information from their peers with their own private evidence accumulation<\/strong>. Most of the studies, both theoretical and experimental, have focused on how isolated individuals optimally gather evidence to make a choice.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This work was motivated by that,&#8221; Karamched said. &#8220;How should individuals optimally accumulate evidence they see for themselves with evidence they obtain from their peers to make the best possible decisions?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Kre\u0161imir Josi?, Moores Professor of Mathematics, Biology and Biochemistry at the University of Houston and senior author of the study, noted that the process works best when individuals in a group make the most of their varied backgrounds to collect the necessary materials and knowledge to make a final decision.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<strong>Collective social decision making is valuable if all individuals have access to different types of information<\/strong>,&#8221; Josi? said.<\/p>\n<p>Karamched used mathematical modeling to reach his conclusion but said there is plenty of room for follow-up research.<\/p>\n<p>Karamched said that his model assumes that evidence accrued by one individual is independent of evidence collected by another member of the group. If a group of individuals is trying to make a decision based on information that is available to everyone, additional modeling would need to account for how correlations in the information affects collective decision-making.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For example, to choose between voting Republican or Democrat in an election, the information available to everyone is common and not specifically made for one individual,&#8221; he said. &#8220;Including correlations will require developing novel techniques to analyze models we develop.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Florida State University press release: Whether it is ants forming a trail or individuals crossing the street, the exchange of information is key in making everyday decisions. But&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2020\/12\/study-suggests-diverse-thinkers-equal-better-results-when-decisionmaking\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":20917,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[526],"tags":[20,127,28],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32866"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32866"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32866\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32883,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32866\/revisions\/32883"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20917"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}