{"id":35094,"date":"2026-11-02T15:31:48","date_gmt":"2026-11-02T20:31:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=35094"},"modified":"2026-11-02T14:39:22","modified_gmt":"2026-11-02T19:39:22","slug":"new-study-finds-that-asking-teachers-to-set-high-expectations-leads-to-more-detailed-feedback-and-reveals-subtle-bias","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2026\/11\/new-study-finds-that-asking-teachers-to-set-high-expectations-leads-to-more-detailed-feedback-and-reveals-subtle-bias\/","title":{"rendered":"New study finds that asking teachers to set high expectations leads to more detailed feedback and reveals subtle bias"},"content":{"rendered":"<header>\n<div class=\"toolbar hidden-print hidden-search\">\n<div class=\"col-xs-6\">\n<div class=\"article-tools pull-right\">\n<div class=\"a2a_kit a2a_kit_size_32 a2a_default_style\"><em>In a national study of nearly 1,000 elementary and middle school teachers, a simple \u201cwise feedback\u201d prompt made teachers\u2019 comments more specific, but also surfaced small race- and gender-linked differences in feedback about students\u2019 math ability and effort.<\/em><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"entry\">\n<p><strong>LOS ANGELES, CA<\/strong>\u2014Prompting teachers to communicate high expectations and confidence in students\u2019 potential leads them to give more detailed feedback, <a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/10.3102\/0013189X261492287\">according to a new study<\/a> led by Yasemin Copur-Gencturk, PhD, a professor of education at USC Rossier and co-director of the USC STEM Center; Ian Thacker, PhD, an associate professor of educational psychology at The University of Texas at San Antonio; and Joseph Cimpian, PhD , a professor of economics and education policy at New York University.<\/p>\n<p>The study, which included nearly 1,000 elementary and middle school teachers across the United States, is the first to show that this kind of prompt can change the substance of what teachers tell students about their work.<\/p>\n<p>The approach, known as \u201cwise feedback,\u201d pairs h<strong>igh performance standards with an assurance that students can meet them<\/strong>. Students who receive wise feedback tend to be more trusting and perform at higher levels.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA relatively small prompt led teachers to give students more specific information about their performance, which is<strong> exactly what students need<\/strong> if feedback is going to support their learning,\u201d said Copur-Gencturk. \u201cInstead of a generic \u2018good job,\u2019 teachers pointed to the strengths and weaknesses in students\u2019 reasoning.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Testing the effect of a single prompt<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The research team randomly assigned teachers to one of two groups. One group was asked to give feedback as they normally would in their classrooms. The other was asked to communicate both high expectations and confidence in the student\u2019s ability to meet them.<\/p>\n<p>All teachers reviewed the same set of mathematical solutions. Each was paired with the image of a randomly assigned White or Black girl or boy presenting the solution in an online classroom environment. That design let the researchers measure how the prompt changed teachers\u2019 feedback and whether its effect depended on a student\u2019s perceived race and gender.<\/p>\n<p><strong>More specific feedback, with an unintended consequence<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Overall, prompted teachers gave more detailed feedback than teachers who responded as usual. They were more likely to name both what students had done well and what they still needed to work on.<\/p>\n<p>The prompt also changed how often teachers commented on students\u2019 ability and effort. Prompted teachers praised a student\u2019s math ability nearly four times as often as teachers who weren\u2019t prompted (8.1% of responses vs. 2.1%). The prompted teachers were also more than five times as likely to question a student\u2019s ability or say the student needed to work harder, though those comments stayed rare, under 3% of responses.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAsking teachers to emphasize a student\u2019s potential nudged some of them to comment on the student instead of the work, more often praising or questioning their math ability,\u201d said Cimpian. \u201cResearch has long shown that feedback about ability, even when it\u2019s positive, <strong>can backfire<\/strong> once students hit a setback.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Those ability and effort comments are also where differences by student race and gender emerged. Though the differences were small, the prompt increased negative comments about the math ability of both Black and White girls, and it significantly increased criticism of effort for every group except White boys. Among prompted teachers, for example, Black girls received negative feedback about their ability 3.3% of the time, compared with 0.6% among teachers who were not prompted.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen teachers focused more explicitly on students\u2019 potential, their feedback also reflected broader societal stereotypes about who is naturally capable in math and who needs to work harder,\u201d said Copur-Gencturk. \u201cIt was a small effect that touched a small percentage of students, but even small slights and biases can snowball over time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The findings build on the team\u2019s earlier research, which found similar patterns in teachers\u2019 perceptions of students\u2019 mathematical ability, and suggest those perceptions can also shape what teachers tell students directly.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn our earlier work, we saw these patterns in what teachers believed about students\u2019 math ability,\u201d said Ian Thacker, associate professor of educational psychology at UT San Antonio, a USC Rossier alumnus, and a co-author of the study. \u201cWhat\u2019s new here is that those beliefs show up in what teachers actually say to students, which can shape their experience in math classrooms.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>What it means for teachers and schools<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The researchers conclude that encouraging teachers to hold high expectations is not enough on its own. Teachers also need support in giving feedback that is specific, actionable and focused on students\u2019 mathematical thinking rather than on assumptions about their ability or effort.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEven when we asked them to, teachers rarely stated their expectations outright, and the prompt didn\u2019t make them any more likely to give students a concrete strategy for improving,\u201d said Cimpian. \u201cTeachers became more likely to point out what needed work, but not to show students how to fix it. That\u2019s a skill that teacher preparation programs and in-service professional development can help teachers build.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>The questions that remain<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Because the study looked at feedback teachers gave to students they did not know, the team does not yet know whether teachers respond the same way in everyday classrooms, where they know their students and have more information about their understanding. It also remains unclear which kinds of professional learning best help teachers give feedback that is specific, actionable and equitable.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAnswering these questions requires continued research on race and gender in education,\u201d said Copur-Gencturk. \u201cYet the current climate, from a lack of funding to pressure around public communication in this area, is making it harder to study inequities and develop evidence-based ways to address them. That limits our ability to create learning environments in which each and every student can flourish.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a national study of nearly 1,000 elementary and middle school teachers, a simple \u201cwise feedback\u201d prompt made teachers\u2019 comments more specific, but also surfaced small race- and gender-linked differences in feedback about students\u2019 math ability and effort. LOS ANGELES, CA\u2014Prompting teachers to communicate high expectations and confidence in students\u2019 potential leads them to give&hellip;&nbsp;<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":35095,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rop_custom_images_group":[],"rop_custom_messages_group":[],"rop_publish_now":"no","rop_publish_now_accounts":[],"rop_publish_now_history":[],"rop_publish_now_status":"pending","neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"off","neve_meta_content_width":70,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1221,891,319,346],"tags":[70,127,122,274,1409,59,443,214],"class_list":["post-35094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academia","category-education","category-learning-2","category-youth","tag-adolescence","tag-decision-making","tag-emotions-2","tag-expectations","tag-goals","tag-management","tag-memory","tag-teens"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35094"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35094\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35096,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35094\/revisions\/35096"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/35095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}