{"id":418,"date":"2011-12-15T16:28:02","date_gmt":"2011-12-15T21:28:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=418"},"modified":"2011-12-19T22:45:18","modified_gmt":"2011-12-20T03:45:18","slug":"study-links-tendency-to-second-guess-ones-decisions-to-unhappiness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2011\/12\/study-links-tendency-to-second-guess-ones-decisions-to-unhappiness\/","title":{"rendered":"Study links tendency to second-guess one&#8217;s decisions to general unhappiness"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Florida State University press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright\" title=\"thinking of options\" src=\"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/images\/blogpics\/Pondering.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/>You&#8217;re in search of a new coffee maker, and the simple quest becomes,  well, an ordeal. After doing copious amounts of research and reading  dozens of consumer reviews, you finally make a purchase, only to wonder:  &#8220;Was this the right choice? Could I do better? What is the return  policy?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Reality check: Is this you?<\/p>\n<p>If so, new research from Florida State University may shed some  light on your inability to make a decision that you&#8217;ll be happy with.<\/p>\n<p>Joyce Ehrlinger, an assistant professor of psychology, has long been  fascinated with individuals identified among psychologists as  &#8220;maximizers.&#8221; <strong>Maximizers tend to obsess over decisions &#8211; big or small &#8211;  and then fret about their choices later. &#8220;Satisficers,&#8221; on the other  hand, tend to make a decision and then live with it.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Happily.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, there are shades of gray. In fact, there&#8217;s a whole  continuum of ways people avoid commitment without really avoiding it.<\/p>\n<p>Ehrlinger&#8217;s latest research on decision making was published in the peer-reviewed journal <em>Personality and Individual Differences<\/em>.  The paper, &#8220;Failing to Commit: Maximizers Avoid Commitment in a Way  That Contributes to Reduced Satisfaction,&#8221; was co-authored with her  graduate student, doctoral candidate Erin Sparks, and colleague Richard  Eibach, a psychology assistant professor at the University of Waterloo  in Ontario, Canada. It examines whether &#8220;maximizers show less commitment  to their choices than satisficers in a way that leaves them  less satisfied with their choices.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The paper, based on two studies of Florida State undergraduate  volunteers, finds that the <strong>maximizers&#8217; focus on finding the best option  ultimately undermines their commitment to their final choices. As a  result, the authors argue, &#8220;maximizers miss out on the psychological  benefits of commitment,&#8221; leaving them less satisfied than their more  contented counterparts, the satisficers.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Past research into the differences between maximizers and  satisficers looked at how the two groups made choices differently and,  more importantly, how the process itself varied. Ehrlinger&#8217;s research,  however, looked at something else entirely: What happened after a choice  was made?<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8220;Because maximizers want to be certain they have made the right  choice,&#8221; the authors contend, &#8220;they are less likely to fully commit to a  decision.&#8221; And most likely, they are less happy in their everyday  lives.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Whether being a maximizer is a central and stable part of the  personality or simply a frame of mind remains unclear, but Ehrlinger  hopes to isolate the cause of the behavior in future research.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Current research is trying to understand whether they can change,&#8221;  she said. &#8220;High-level maximizers certainly cause themselves a lot of  grief.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Over the years, Ehrlinger&#8217;s scholarly research has led her to study  self-perception and accuracy and error in self-judgment. Her latest  research into the ways maximizers avoid commitment is important for  several reasons.<\/p>\n<p>First, <strong>the differences between maximizers and satisficers may play a  bigger role than previously thought in consumer decision making and  purchasing. For example: &#8220;Maximizers get nervous when they see an &#8216;All  Sales Are Final&#8217; sign because it forces them to commit,&#8221; Ehrlinger said.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Also, <strong>a maximizer&#8217;s lack of contentment creates a lot of stress, so  the trait could potentially have an enormous effect on health<\/strong>, Ehrlinger  explained. It&#8217;s not just coffee-maker purchases they stress over &#8211; and  second-guess themselves about &#8211; it&#8217;s also the big life decisions such as  choosing a mate, buying a house or applying for a job.<\/p>\n<p>Even after considerable deliberation before choosing a mate or a  house, a high-level maximizer may still feel unhappy, even depressed,  with his or her final decision.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<strong>Identifying the &#8216;right&#8217; choice can be a never-ending task (for a  maximizer)<\/strong>,&#8221; Ehrlinger and her co-authors write. &#8220;<strong>Feelings about which  option is best can always change in the face of new information.  Maximizers might be unable to fully embrace a choice because they cannot  be absolutely certain they chose the best possible option<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Florida State University press release: You&#8217;re in search of a new coffee maker, and the simple quest becomes, well, an ordeal. After doing copious amounts of research and&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2011\/12\/study-links-tendency-to-second-guess-ones-decisions-to-unhappiness\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,7],"tags":[175,28,108,32,12,176],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=418"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":422,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/418\/revisions\/422"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=418"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=418"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=418"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}