{"id":7354,"date":"2012-10-18T16:44:48","date_gmt":"2012-10-18T20:44:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/?p=7354"},"modified":"2012-10-23T15:55:03","modified_gmt":"2012-10-23T19:55:03","slug":"study-explores-physiological-behavioural-responses-to-gambling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2012\/10\/study-explores-physiological-behavioural-responses-to-gambling\/","title":{"rendered":"Study explores physiological, behavioural responses to gambling"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>From the Springer Science+Business Media press release via ScienceDaily:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><img class=\"alignright\" src=\"http:\/\/www.therapytoronto.ca\/images\/blogpics\/Gambling.jpg\" alt=\"Gambling\" \/>A new study provides evidence that <strong>gamblers interpret near-misses as frustrating losses rather than near-wins<\/strong>. This frustration stimulates the reward systems in the brain to promote continued gambling, according to Mike Dixon from the University of Waterloo in Canada, and his colleagues.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This, in turn, may contribute to addictive gambling behavior<\/strong>. Their work is published online in Springer&#8217;s <em>Journal of Gambling Studies. <\/em><\/p>\n<p>Dr. Dixon comments, &#8220;Our findings support the hypothesis that these types of near-misses are a particularly frustrating form of loss, and contradict the supposition that they are a mis-categorized win. Specifically, <strong>following these types of near-misses, participants may be driven to spin again as quickly as possible to remove themselves from a particularly frustrating state<\/strong>.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Studies to date have shown that near-misses support persistent gambling and activate brain areas that reinforce certain behaviors. If near-misses are seen as near-wins, then they should be pleasurable. If, however, near-misses are highly frustrating losses, then they should be unpleasant. Dixon and team set out to shed light on this debate.<\/p>\n<p>They measured the time between the result of a spin and the initiation of the next spin following losses, near-misses and wins of various sizes among 122 participants as they played a slot machine simulator. <strong>Of the 122 gamblers, 22 were non-problem gamblers, 37 were at risk players and 23 were problem gamblers<\/strong>. The researchers also assessed the players&#8217; frustration levels by measuring the rate at which electricity travels through the skin. Skin responses reflect psychophysical changes as a result of frustration.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The analyses showed that progressively larger wins led to longer pauses between spins and increased arousal levels<\/strong>. Near-misses with jackpot symbols landing on the first two reels led to significantly larger skin responses than regular losses and other types of near-misses. In addition, the gamblers were compelled to repeat the spin as quickly as possible after this type of near miss.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;By activating what we call the appetitive component of the mesolimbic rewards system, these near-misses may help a player develop a hopeful, subjective impression that the next win is imminent,&#8221; said Dixon. &#8220;This might ultimately contribute to the sensitization of the appetitive system, which plays a key role in addictive behavior.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on the_content --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on the_content -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From the Springer Science+Business Media press release via ScienceDaily: A new study provides evidence that gamblers interpret near-misses as frustrating losses rather than near-wins. This frustration stimulates the reward systems&#8230; <a class=\"read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/2012\/10\/study-explores-physiological-behavioural-responses-to-gambling\/\">Read more &raquo;<\/a><!-- AddThis Advanced Settings generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><!-- AddThis Share Buttons generic via filter on get_the_excerpt --><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[5,6],"tags":[21,42,52],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7354"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7354"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7354\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7488,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7354\/revisions\/7488"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/therapytoronto.ca\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}